GLOBAL GREEN ENERGY (R)EVOLUTION VS. GLOBAL GOVERNMENT


New Zealand gives green light to controversial wind farm - 01 Dec 2010 - News from BusinessGreen


Contact Energy secures go ahead for wind farm.

Dept. Of Energy Wind Power Web Site


Wind Powering America    DOE pdf.file


(vid) Maglev Wind Turbine

Maglev Wind Turbine 2 Giga Watts. It's Huge, but it's equivelent to 1,000 of todays wind turbines, and it sits on just 100 acres.

 

(vid) As Wind Power Expands, So Do Threats to Bat Population

Do Bat deaths make the wind energy choice more complicated? NO. Because continued reliance on fossil fuels, instead of a surge of wind power means: that climate change will ensure that there are no bats, bugs, birds, or people to inhabit the earth anyway.


(vid) Turkey Hill Wind Turbines

News story ( October 2010 ) about american wind & solar projects. Yes they got federal stimulus funding, but so does the fossil fuel industry. We need to take that funding from fossil fuels and put it all into wind & solar power.


LIST: Large Publicly Traded Wind Turbine Companies Of The World

Large Publicly Traded Wind Turbine Companies Of The World

 
China’s Wind Power to Equal 13 Three Gorges Dams by 2020

 Outlook 2010

China’s wind power can reach 230 GW of installed capacity by 2020, which is equal to 13 times the current capacity of the Three Gorges Dam; its annual electricity output of 464.9 TWh could replace 200 coal fire power plants, according to China Wind Power Outlook 2010, a new report jointly released by Greenpeace, the Chinese Renewable Energy Industries Association (CREIA), and the Global Wind Energy Council (GWEC).
In 2009, China led the world in newly installed wind-energy devices, reaching a capacity of 13.8 GW (10,129 turbines) – a rate of one new turbine every hour. In terms of overall capacity, China ranks second, at 25.8 GW.
The report projects that by 2020, China’s total wind power capacity will reach at least 150GW, possibly up to 230GW, which, if realized, could cut 410 million tons of CO2 emission, or 150 million tons of coal consumption.
Compared to multinationals, many Chinese companies are young and lack a strong basis for research and development. Despite a renewable energy policy requiring grid companies to purchase all electricity from wind farms, access to wind power for the grid is frequently lagging behind an unstable, out-dated grid infrastructure. There is also the problem of a lack of incentives and penalties for grid companies, and slow progress in more wind energy technologies.

China's Wind Power Capacity Could Replace 2,600 Coal Fired Plants. If They Can Do That, Why Can't The U.S. Do It ?

Wind Power Kills ........ Massey, Duke, Nukes, BP & Piedmont can relax. They are not the only bad guys to blame the end of the Empire on! ... Or we can build a lot of EV farm equipment right now!!

Pete Whipple


Hey there,.... it's actually bats who are at the most risk to wind power because insects are attracted to the heat from the generator at the top of the post. A gear housing at the top of the post and a generator at ground level would solve... the problem.

There is also a cylindrical wind technology called the mag lev turbine which uses magnetic bearings (identical to hi-speed mag lift trains) with zero friction, allowing the turbine to be the size of an office building on less than 5 acres and producing the equivilent of 1,500 bladed turbines. think of a giant bird/bat safe coffee can combined with the rotating space needle restaraunt.

I hope you noticed my mention of pebble reactors from the page http://theenergycollective.com/ It follows up the past ten years of one of our ealier discussions. you might appreciate my twiitter account, @ cleanelectric. As a whole, it is a fairly comprehensive list (in the works) of scientists, spiritual leaders, energy corporations, media outlets, and politicians from both sides of ther aisle in regards to energy and society.

It is painfull to learn of any fatality or injury, especially in the workplace and at home. I am sorry to hear about the 4 farmers in the story you shared. I did not klnow about it. I was pre occupied with the news of the deaths of 50 or so coal miners in two separate accidents in coal mines owned by the same company (Massey Energy) since April of last year. There have been 437 coal mining fatalities between 1996 and 2009. (so the tally is about 487 souls lost in 15 years.)

I don't deny that electrical fires, and transformer explosions occur. My adult carreer has been aboard ships that generate enough electrical energy to power 10 city blocks. I have had the unfortunate experience of having to arrest one of those fires aboard a ship I once served.

Most of our countries electric utilities happen to be cooperatively owned. It is very unfortunate that "communism" is such a dirty word, because these co-op utilities have been operating in america since Edison invented the lightbulb. Your own power most likely comes from one of these publicly owned utilities, even if it is coal or nuclear sourced. These utilities are generally publicly owned and nearly all, if not all offer a renewable energy choice as part of your service. contact your local utiltity to find out more.

These utilities are what make up our "grid" or "transmission" system. They have little or no say where the source power comes from ie. coal, hydro, nuclear, wind etc. unless you, the customer demand it. It is not the source that makes the transmission lines dangerous. Transmission lines will always demand a healthy respect for safety. It is the source itself that could be dangerous in many other ways.

Ironically with the "real Tesla" not the EV automobile company, the world once had the chance of going DC rather than AC which would have required "micro" transmission stations in every neighborhood, butalso not likely to kill anybody (instead it would have the same effect as in a shock from your gasoline lawnmower or car battery.)

Wind and solar begins as a safer DC current. To be compatible with the existing grid system which was designed for electricity that was created by the burning of fossil fuels, and then "pushed" long distances through transmissioin lines, wind and solar needs to be "stepped up" to a deadly voltage or localized so that the "high voltage push" is not needed.

Since thousands of miles of transmission lines are already in place at enormous expense, and "off grid" private residential systems are difficult or impossible to tax, grid ready renewable sources make the most sense. Fortunately, or unfortunately, fatalities attributed to the grid cannot be blamed on the source, at least as long as the sources are mixed. Just to be a smartass, I can't resist adding that nuclear energy never has been and never will be the safer DC current.

Incidentally, I have no idea how many diesel powered truckloads are used in the life of a coal mine, but I do know that each natural gas fracking opoeration uses 1,150 trucks per well, and there are about 10,000 gas wells in the Dallas/Ft.Worth area alone. Dick Cheney leased millions of acres of "public land" to be fracked by natural gas companies in an area called, The Jonah Fields, adjacent to the Grand Canyon.

All this doesn't sound very cost or safety effective, or at all fair to the american public, especially if you take into consideration that there is no freakin' way it takes any where near that many truckloads to build and service a solar or wind farm.

One of my opponents claimed that wind power will never work because enough wind turbines to power the country would take up the whole state of Montana. I maintain that if you put all of the coal mines and all of the gas wells that presently power our country in one place, that you would never find Montana again.

I think it is absolutely shamefull and un-christian for anybody, especially politicians and employers to tell employees of coal mines and other fossil fuel industries that the feds, EPA, and the general public doesn't care about them and want to take their jobs and livelyhoods away. These workers don't deserve to be made the scapegoats in the climate change debate. Nobody is trying to take their jobs away.

In the past, people have given their lives for their values. Today, in spite of, or combined with, a serious global economic crisis, some would wish that miners and roughnecks would cvall a general strike and just walk away from their jobs and find something else to pay the bills, like the iceman who saw the refridgerator coming.

1. I think the U.S. needs to get tougher on environmental protection everywhere that U.S. companies operate.

2. That the U.S. spearhead widespread development of EV farm equipment as an insurance policy against the "peak oil" crisis and then vulnerability of our agriculture industry and our ability to keep food affordable to all americans.

3. Last, but not least, non-management fossil fuel employees and thier families should have genuine incentives and exclusive opportunities to re-employ in the green energy sector, much in the same way a vet gets extra points over a civilian with the same qualifications.
See More

about a minute ago ·

Mag Lev Wind Turbines: One utility scale vertical axis wind turbine can replace up to 1,000 standard wind turbines

A utility scale 1 Mega watt magnetic levitation vertcical axis wind turbine can be built on about 100 acres and replace up to 500 standard wind turbines. Each standard wind turbine can power 750,000 homes. Wind power combined with advanced flywheel energy storage and load leveling technology can provide electricity 24 hours per day. A 2 Gigawatt version can also be built on 100 acres and power 1.5 million homes. The advanced flywheel energy storage and load leveling technology also works well with photo voltaic solar.

There are 330 million households in the U.S. so it would only take 22,000 acres to supply all of americas current energy needs. To put that into perspective the state of Montana is 94,185,600 acres.

An important milestone in global wind energy is that the State of Texas is the worlds 4th largest producer of wind power (using standard bladed wind turbines behind Germany, Spain, and India. These countries and China all subsidize green renewable energy systems but the U.S. does not.





An easy way to remember the capacities of electricity:
one megawatt = the usage of 750 to 1,000 homes.



















 

Home Depot Starts Selling Personal Wind Turbines


Micon wind turbine, Dithmarschen.
Image via Wikipedia

Although I’m guessing that the only thing “personal” item flying off the shelves of Home Depot stores across the country right now are personal cooling units, the big box purveyor of paints, potted plants, and home improvement accoutrement is now also selling personal wind turbines at select stores in Idaho, Nevada, Texas, Utah, Wyoming, and California.
Similar to Lowe’s teaming up with Sungevity to offer shoppers affordable, in-store solar leasing options, the Home Depot has partnered with Flagstaff, Ariz.-based company Southwest Windpower in an effort to bring clean, renewable wind-based power to the masses.
As reported by Preston over at Jetson Green, the particular product being offered by Home Depot is the sleek (read: quiet), grid-connected Skystream 3.7, a unit described by Southwest Windpower as “the first compact, all-inclusive personal wind generator (with controls and inverter built in) designed to work in very low winds.” Included with the actual turbine is Skyview monitoring software that allows homeowners to track the Skystream 3.7’s performance from the comfort of their PC. Weighing 205 pounds, the unit comes with a five-year warranty and is capable of producing up to 400 kilowatt hours of clean electricity per month (based on prelim data).
The total price for the Skystream 3.7, including installation costs, varies by location but from what I gather the units alone are in the ballpark of $6,000. Homeowners, if qualified, will be able to knock off a few bucks of the sticker price as the turbine is eligible for local, state, and federal incentives including a 30 percent federal tax credit. And although the turbines will only be available for purchase at select stores in the aforementioned states, the company plans to expand the program to “windy locations across the United States.”
Says Southwest Windpower CEO Dixon Thayer is an official release:

The Skystream install program represents Southwest Windpower’s commitment to making renewable energy affordable and accessible to consumers everywhere. We are excited to help residential and commercial customers take advantage of their area’s exceptional wind resource by using Skystream 3.7 to produce clean, emissions-free energy.
Home Depot shoppers in windy areas of Idaho, Nevada, Texas, Utah, Wyoming, and California: Any interest? Anyone out there have experience with compact, grid-tied turbines including the Skystream 3.7? Has owning a compact wind turbine freed up time for you to toss a beach ball or play tug-a-war with your children?



COMMENTS:




cleanelectric 15 minutes ago
A true Green Energy Future is a world wide: Industrial, Economic, Political, and Social (R)Evolution. We should be deploying wind and solar power along every freeway interstate, in every parking lot, on everylamp-post and building that already exists. The safest way to ensure the National Security of our agruculture system is with Electric farming Equipment. Now those are some smart things we can invest in.
 


Wind Power Will Destroy The World - Rush Limbaugh



Exclusive:

"Windmills may blow earth off orbit and crash us into the sun."

 
Just when I thought Rush couldn't get any stupider.








DIRTY ENERGY WHORE LAMAR ALEXANDER SPEAKS AT A
HERITAGE FOUNDATION DISINFORMATION BANQUET.

http://www.heritage.org/initiatives/energy-and-environment



IS WIND POWER TO DANGEROUS FOR AMERICA?


WIND TURBINE NEWS 2012

We already know that utlity scale wind and solar power can achieve all of america's energy needs but suburban and urban green energy systems not only advance our total energy production, it also creates additional jobs in manufacturing, construction, and maintenance.

Both utility scale and suburban/urban green energy developement provides immediate jobs in the U.S. and world wide. It remains to be seen if green energy jobs absorb all of the jobs vacated by an archival and mothballing of fossil fuels, but it is likely that by harnessing abundant renewable energy that everyone would be able to work less and enjoy life more.

Investing in and developing green energy on a global scale is necessary and inevitable for survival, but the first step is changing the way we live. This can be best illustrated by the following poster. Please copy it and share it.




It seems that virtually every U.S. politician is an oil and fossil fuel man or woman except (on the surface anyway) Barack Obama. Unfortunately Obama signed the NDAA which allows the U.S. to ignore the Constitution and arrest and detain indefinately anyone without trial, made it a felony to protests "too close" to politicians, and supports the illegal Bush/Cheney/Rice "Patriot Act." so he has lost all credibility as a proponent of societal advancement.


You may be wondering why politics is my introduction to modern wind turbine technology. The answer is in the State of Texas and Ron Paul. Texas was born as cattle country that resisted last centuries industrial revolution of oil invading it's soil. Today cattle graze under wind turbines and these turbines are resisted by some residents who grew up with texas oil. None the less, Texas is the world's 4th largest wind power energy producer in the world behind Germany, India, and China.

The land owner royalty payments for wind farms (currently ranging from $3500 to $5000 per installed megawatt per year.) A typical Texas ranch could have as many as 50 turbines on the propertry. This sure beats the heck out of leasing your land for oil and gas wells and all the risk that goes along with them.

Each utility scale wind turbine averages 1.5 megawatts. This is enough to power 300 or more homes each, and there are tens of thousands in Texas, California, Wyoming, Washington and the world already.

Ron Paul who is from Texas, and who wants our troops off of foreign soil, and who is the only true Constitutionalist running for president, and the only candidate who doesn't say one thing and then do another, and who's actions actually back up his promises, must admit that a "green energy resolution" is a logical and necessary part of U.S. strength and societal advancement.

Here are a few links about the Texas Wind Industry:

Reuter News: Texas sets wind power records with new grid analysis










Utility Scale Magnetic Levitation (Mag Lev) Wind Turbines:







Suburban and Urban Vertical Axis (VAWT) Wind Turbines :
















Lamp Post Highway and Parking Lot VAWT's







6 AND 5 kw Urban Designed VAWT's




Mag Lev and VAWT's are considered bird and bat safe as compared to "bladed" wind turbines which birds fly into and the bats radar are attracted to (mistaking heat from the turbine as body heat from insects which are bat food.)

Birds and bats may or may not adapt to the presence of wind turbines, trooth be told, nothing can adapt to toxins in our environment except cockroaches. If we use the immediate safety of birds and bats as an excuse not to utilize wind energy, we may as well make window glass illegal too.

I live in a coastal community and there is always wind here. I have been through Wyoming where wind farms are constructed in 100MPH winds. Even if you do not believe in Climate Change or Global Warming the wind always blows, often to hurricane and tornado force. If you do believe in climate change and global warming then the model predicts higher wind speeds more often.

I suggest that we shelve the terms "climate change and global warming" and get back to the basics we have all known since grade school, which is that the burning of fossil fuels ie. fire of any sort creates a by product called pollution and with 7 Billion people on the planet, the less we burn the better.

Article from: Bright Energy.org

Los Angeles reaches 20% renewable energy goal


Wind power comprised nearly 50% of all LADWP’s renewable energy in 2010
The Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP) has celebrated providing 20% of the city’s power using renewable energy sources.
The utility actually delivered 19.7% of power from renewable energy sources in 2010, as it will report to the California Energy Commission, which uses a standard process that rounds up the figure to the closest percentage.
The milestone was achieved through a combination of major projects and power agreements made in the last five years, the municipal utility said yesterday.
In 2005, the LADWP made a commitment to increase the utility’s use of clean, green renewable energy from 5% to 20% by the year 2010.
This amount of renewable power provided to customers — 4,500 gigawatt-hours (GWh) — is equivalent to annually removing 750,000 homes from the power grid, preventing 2.5 million metric tons of CO2 emissions, or removing nearly to 490,000 cars from the road.
In June 2009, LADWP began full operation of the Pine Tree Wind Power Plant — the nation’s largest wind farm owned by a municipal utility, in the Tehachapi Mountains. Wind power comprised nearly 50% of all LADWP’s renewable energy in 2010 with small hydro-electric contributing 30%, geothermal/biofuels, 22%, and solar, 1%.
Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa said: “When I became Mayor, I set a goal to generate 20% of the City’s power from renewable energy sources by 2010 and I am proud to say that we have achieved that goal
“We went from worst to first and quadrupled our renewable energy portfolio in a few short years while also keeping our rates lower than other major utilities. Today’s announcement illustrates that the DWP is a national leader in cost-effective, environmentally responsible and reliable energy,” added the Mayor.

Emissions

As well as achieving 20% renewable energy in 2010, LADWP has reduced its carbon emissions to 22% below 1990 levels through a combination of expanding renewable energy; replacing old generators with efficient and ultra-clean power plants; and promoting energy efficiency among its customers.
Since 2006, LADWP customers have saved enough energy to remove 343,000 metric tons of CO2 emissions from our air each year. This equates to removing 66,000 cars from the road annually. Currently 3% of the City’s total power use is offset by energy efficiency, and LADWP expects to save an additional 7% through energy efficiency by 2020.
Meanwhile, LADWP is currently weaning itself off coal power, and in 2010 only 39% of its power portfolio came from the fossil fuel.
The utility is in the process of divesting of the Navajo Generating Station in Arizona by 2014, which will reduce carbon emissions by an additional 26%, it said.
Moving forward, LADWP said it will continue to develop new wind and solar projects close to existing transmission lines and other infrastructure. This includes local in-basin solar and a feed-in tariff program which would allow private parties to sell power to LADWP for distribution on the grid.
More wind news »   |   Main news index »   |   Sign up for our free newsletter »

One Response to “Los Angeles reaches 20% renewable energy goal”

  • I am guessing by the other figures released in this article that the coal source was reduced by about 10% or so. Newer, more efficient fossil fuel generators are a step in the right direction, but not truly green. This alone will not make enough of a difference to really matter in the long run. However, 5% to 20% renewable in 5 years is fantastic, especially for a city the size of Los Angeles. If L.A. can do at least that much in relatively short order, any municipality can at least do the same.
    This is the sort of good news that must be shouted from the mountaintops of Appalachia (while there are still mountaintops there)…and run head to head against other energy sector news stories that have come out in recent weeks such as these three stories:
    Piedmont Energy’s announcement of investing $3 Billion for a new gas/coal plant, touted as being more efficient and cleaner than older powerplants, but also ignoring the gas fracking issues for gas, mountaintop removal, and the same old risks of mining that have always been part of the industry.
    The recent tragedy of loss of life at a Massey Coal Mine, which is actually the second accident in a Massey Mine since April 2010 (in less than one year) resulting in a total loss of life of about 50 souls. This horrible news coming from a company that posted a 2007 report on Wikepedia praising themselves for their safety record by comparing their “non-fatal safety record” as nearly even to the workplace safety record of the “retail industry” in our country.
    Also, in less than a year of prior bad news, BP was just granted within the last few days, “permitting to drill for oil offshore in the Arctic.”
    The record of the fossil fuel sector in the last few weeks and months is status quo for these fuel sources for more than 100 years. Chevron is accused of massive pollution of the Amazon, Exxon had a really bad day at the office in Prince William Sound Alaska.
    In the 1970′s coal miners went on strike for safer working conditions after a few dozen miners where killed in an explosion, and the mine owner, Duke Energy refused to negotiate for more than a year, and only came to the table after one of their thugs shot and killed a miner on the picket line.
    Pete Seeger wrote a song about a similiar situation that occurred in the 1900′s when dozens of miners striking for safer working conditions were murdered and thrown into a hole.
    It is the very definition of “irony” that the employers in the fossil fuel sector tell their employees that the EPA, the Dems, the liberals, and the commies don’t care about them. Nothing could be further from the truth. The reality check is that the EPA, Dems, liberals, and commies care about everybody.
    In fact, if you step back to see the whole picture, the Republicans, right wingers, and Libertarians (although some doubt the latter)also care about everybody. So why the impasse? Why make the employees and the families in the fossil fuel sector the scapegoats for the status quo? It’s not the economy, or climate change, however both are on our shoulders poised and ready to slash our throats…. it is our food supply, which at this moment depends on fossil fuels in order to be harvested, transported, and refridgerated.
    The ugly truth is that our leaders are paralyzed with fear, of disrupting our food supply, their hands could be frozen on the steering wheel until we all crash and climate change does us all in. It is horribly unfair to tell coal miners, all other fossil fuel employees, and their families that their own brothers, sisters, and government don’t care about them. They deserve the best jobs in the green energy sector nationwide.
    The news of the success of the LADWP of going from 5% to 20% renewable in 5 years must be shared. It will give people hope that this is not the end, rather that this is a whole new beginning for mankind. LADWP’s recent success is more than applaudable. If we all work together we can even do much better than that, and on a global scale. Other people in other countries want the same future and same survivability that we all do.

Molten Salt Solar - 24 hour per day electricity

Each molten salt solar plant of todays current technology can power 25,000 homes with each 4 square mile plant. To put that in perspective:

If all the plants where only built in one place for example Arizona and New Mexico they would generate enough electricity for 1.5 billion homes. There are 330 million households in america, this equates to nearly 5 times the power we currently use.

Solar Power Plants of 200 Megawatt plants producing enough electricity for 100,000 homes each would produce 5 times the power in my example above.

There is no air pollution and no toxic by products. Each plant takes approximately 30 months to build and provides 1,500 jobs. Imagine if every country in the world built molten salt solar. Australia already has plans for a network of 12 districts that will supply 100% of Australias energy needs, including transportation using electric vehicles.



A quick fix to our energy problems really is true.























OCCUPY TOGETHER AND KICK THE FOSSIL FUEL HABIT.

Is The Lorax The Only Being On Earth Who Cares About The Trees?

In the Dr. Suess book, The Lorax was the only one who cared about the trees. The only one who spoke out about corporations cutting them all down. All we all ever needed to know we each learned in Kindergarten !!!

Break free of the indoctrination of consumerism, greed, and self gratification that you learned in college and remember what Aristotle and Socratese and all of those fine brothers and sisters from our glorious human history meant for  "higher education" to become.