GLOBAL GREEN ENERGY (R)EVOLUTION VS. GLOBAL GOVERNMENT


Election Fraud - An American Tradition

Election Fraud is global corporate bribery. U.S. politicians like to "over see" foreign elections on the premise that our government is perfect and honest and therefore qualified to approve "fairness."
 
We over see elections wherever we have troops. Wherever we have troops there is oil. George Bush beat Al Gore to the Whitehouse over allegations of election fraud in Florida, the same state his brother Jeb Bush was Governor. If that doesn't smell like Tuna rotting on a dock in the Florida sun I don't know what does.
 
There has already been allegations of complicancy between the Republican Party and the Media regardeing ron Paul delegate counts in the Maine Caucuses and it should be obvious to everybody that main stream media ignores Ron Paul, he gets less time during debates, less coverage on nightly news, he is not even given face time to set himself apart from the other candidates. Why?
 
Why? because he could win and become President and the rest of those old boys will be thrown out with the trash. Nobody agrees entirely with another and with that understanding people will change parties to vote for Ron Paul. People who never voted before will vote for Ron Paul. If Ron Paul failed to get the Republican Nomination he would continue to run as an Independent, Green, or Libertarian.
 
There are two reasons Ron Paul hasn't shown better in the delegate counts: Fraud, and most of his supporters have yet to join the Republican party and become delegates in this time of Caucuses instead of Primaries, but it is not too late if you act now.... otherwisw we will all have to write him in.
 
Now is the time to decide if you will write in Ron Paul if necessary, or write in Anonymous instead. Meanwhile, the other three Republican candidates are embroiled in a quagmire of ethics violations, religious tunnelvision, and off shore wealth that each obviously only benefit a few special interests and not the people as a whole society.
 
Obama signed the NDAA which makes every person on the planet is vulnerable to indefinite imprisonment without a trial or due process, made the assasination of U.S. citizens legal, and made free speech a felony if it is done within several city blocks of a politicians appearence. Obama's actions are like a turd in the corner of the room that fouls every other thing he does.


Election Fraud: Russian Protests : New York Daily News

Protests remained peaceful;

less than 100 arrested nationwide

Saturday, December 10 2011, 1:07 PM

Demonstrators shout during a mass rally to protest against alleged vote rigging in Russia's parliamentary elections in Moscow, Russia, Saturday, Dec. 10, 2011.
Mikhial Metzel/AP
 
Demonstrators shout during a mass rally to protest against alleged vote rigging 
in Russia's parliamentary elections in Moscow, Russia, Saturday, Dec. 10, 2011.                                                                                                                                                                       
 
Tens of thousands of people poured onto the streets of Russia's capital to protest what they claim was a rigged parliamentary election. “The falsifications that authorities are doing today have turned into a big theater, with clowns like in a circus,” Moscow demonstrator Alexander Tromifov told the Associated Press. As many as 50,000 people showed up to protest in Moscow, the BBC reported, making it the largest Russia has seen since the fall of the Soviet Union — and the first time Prime Minister Vladimir Putin has had to deal with a mass uprising. Smaller protests took place in cities across the country, including St. Petersburg where about 10,000 turned out to a protest.

 The protests remained peaceful, and the police response was uncharacteristically lighthanded. Less than 100 people across the country were arrested, according to the Associated Press.
In addition to a new election, the protest's organizers demanded the resignation of the head of the election commission, new election laws, and freedom for political prisoners, The Guardian reported.

“Everyone is sick of living under this regime which forbids freedom of expression,” a protester told CBS News. “We are against the lies and bankrupt politicians.”

Putin has dismissed popular anger over the election, blaming US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for planting the idea that the vote was rigged in order to destabilize his government.
The protests follow reports from election monitors and Russian citizens that Putin's party, United Russia, engaged in widespread ballot stuffing. Earlier this week, current President Dmitry Medvedev promised an investigation into the allegations of fraud.

Putin has held top positions of power in Russia's government since he became President 12 years ago. He served as President of Russia from 2000 to 2008, before becoming Prime Minister — and he's seeking a third presidential term this spring.


Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/russian-protesters-streets-alleged-election-fraud-article-1.989677#ixzz1gjpzLoGy

The Saudi Arab Spring Nobody Noticed

Amnesty (International) says the (Saudi) government has drafted an anti-terror law that would effectively criminalise dissent as a “terrorist crime” and allow extended detention without charge or trial. Sound Familiar people? Just like Obama did to americans in the U.S. No coincidence that the U.S. and Saudi Governments are "oil buddies."
~cleanelectric


The Saudi Arab Spring Nobody Noticed
by Russ Baker
   
December 8, 2011   



Hear the one about the Arab Spring in Saudi Arabia that nobody noticed?
No, this is not a joke. It is a real situation—and a cautionary example of what happens when Western governments and their media are more favorable to some “revolutions” than others.
With the Syrian regime, long out of favor with the West, we heard about the uprising from the beginning. The drumbeat has grown dramatically, along with Western condemnations and moves to isolate the regime for its crackdown on dissent.

In the case of Libya, run by the fiercely independent and eccentric Qaddafi, much of the world’s press credulously rushed to print every rumor about regime excesses, many of them never verified and seemingly untrue. (For more on that, see this and this and this.) The press portrayed the rebels as heroes, and featured almost daily coverage. As NATO launched a creeping intervention which ended with wall to wall bombing, the media accepted its claim that the intervention was to stop Qaddafi from harming or further oppressing his people.

The media quickly took to—and stayed with— the uprising in Egypt, one of the poorest countries in the region, where the West lost an ally but quickly found a new collaborator in a similarly-inclined military junta.
In the case of the mother of all petro-allies, Saudi Arabia, however, protests have been met with near silence by the media and no expressions of sympathy for the dissenters by Western governments.


THE SAUDI STRUGGLE

Here’s the background: On November 21, government troops opened fire on demonstrators in Saudi Arabia’s Eastern Province, killing at least four and injuring more. Given the general paucity of demonstrations in a country where dissent is dealt with fiercely, the unrest and violence seemed a highly newsworthy development.

The next day, the Middle-East-based Al Jazeera English, the “best” Western source of news from the region, punted. Instead of getting direct eyewitness accounts that might anger the Saudi leadership (close allies of the Emir of Qatar, who owns Al Jazeera), the network used an old trick. It quoted a Western news agency, the French outfit Agence France Press, which merely reported the Saudi government’s version of events. (For more on blatant inconsistencies in how Al Jazeera covers different uprisings in the region, see this WhoWhatWhy article)

Two days after Al Jazeera, the Associated Press had its own report, also based on the Saudi spokesman. The article did note “a series of clashes between police and protesters in the country’s Shiite-dominated eastern region, starting in the spring.” It noted:
The Interior Ministry previously blamed what it described as “seditious” residents, saying they attacked security forces with guns and firebombs with the backing of a foreign enemy — an apparent reference to Shiite power Iran.
The ministry statement Thursday said the deaths in the new unrest were the result of exchanges of fire since Monday with “unknown criminals,” who it said fired on security checkpoints and vehicles from houses and alleyways.
The purported context comes in the final paragraph:
There is a long history of discord between the kingdom’s Sunni rulers and the Shiite minority concentrated in the east, Saudi Arabia’s key oil-producing region. Shiites make up 10 percent of the kingdom’s 23 million citizens and complain of discrimination, saying they are barred from key positions in the military and government and are not given a proportionate share of the country’s wealth.
The salient point in Saudi Arabia, however, is not really ethnic discrimination, which exists throughout the world. It is the story of the avarice and brutality through which one extended family dominates a country.

In Libya, the uprising was dominated by a distinct tribal opposition, yet it was quickly characterized as representing broad national sentiment, with a kind of nobility and inevitability. Not so (up to now) with reporting on the Saudi protests. In truth, dissatisfaction with the Saudi royal family is hardly limited to the Shiites, and the levels of anger are probably as great and perhaps greater than that felt by the average Libyan toward Qaddafi.


ANOTHER VIEW

Those wanting a closer look at what is going on in Saudi Arabia can go to the site Liveleak, where there’s highly disturbing video accompanied by this text: “Qatif—Firing live bullets at the demonstrators November 21, 2011: Video shows the brutal style Saudi security forces in dealing with the demonstrators by firing live bullets.” Another source is a blog called “Angry Arab News Service,” which features video in which a large and vocal group in Qatif are apparently chanting “Death to the House of Saud”:

That kind of material seems to warrant worldwide attention. And with that, we might reasonably expect the protests to grow. But the coverage has not come, nor the greater uprising.
New York Times

Who’s to blame? Everyone, really. But based on its claim to be the gold standard, we focus on the New York Times. According to a search of the database Nexis-Lexis, the Times ran nothing at all on Qatif until Sunday November 27, when it featured a survey of turmoil throughout the region. A reference to Qatif was buried deep toward the end of the piece, where it would go almost unnoticed.

Yet the Times should have realizing that it was looking at a pattern. After all, the paper did cover a previous incident in Qatif—back in March. It was a single article, with a Beirut dateline.
Saudi police officers opened fire at a protest march in a restive, oil-rich province on Thursday, wounding at least three people, according to witnesses and a Saudi government official.
[Snip]
Witnesses described the small protest march in the eastern city of Qatif as peaceful, but an Interior Ministry spokesman said demonstrators had attacked the police before the officers began firing, Reuters reported.
[Snip]
The clash with protesters in Qatif, located in a heavily Shiite region, underscored longstanding tensions in Saudi society: there is a sense among the Shiite minority that it is discriminated against by a government practicing a zealous form of Sunni orthodoxy.
No emphasis on the self-dealing, greed and barbarity that characterize the Saudi dictatorship. Ironically, that was when demonstrations in Libya were all over the news, with constant emphasis on Qaddafi’s infamy. Here are some New York Times headlines from Libya in the Spring:

Time’s Up, Qaddafi (an opinion piece)

THE REAL STORY
So, what’s the real story in Saudi Arabia? December brought a report from the human rights group Amnesty International, covered as follows by BBC:
Saudi Arabia accused of repression after Arab Spring
Amnesty International has accused Saudi Arabia of reacting to the Arab Spring by launching a wave of repression. In a report, the human rights group said hundreds of people had been arrested, many of them without charge or trial.
Prominent reformists had been given long sentences following trials Amnesty called “grossly unfair”. So far unrest has largely been confined to the Shia minority in the east of the country.

….In its 73-page report published on Thursday, Amnesty accuses the Saudi authorities of arresting hundreds of people for demanding political and social reforms or for calling for the release of relatives detained without charge or trial.
The report says that sinceFebruary, when sporadic demonstrations began – in defiance of a permanent national ban on protests – the Saudi government has carried out a crackdown….

Since March, more than 300 people who took part in peaceful protests in Qatif, Ahsa and Awwamiya in the east have been detained, Amnesty says. Most have been released, often after promising not to protest again. Many face travel bans.
Last week 16 men, including nine prominent reformists, were given sentences ranging from five to 30 years in prison. Amnesty said they were blindfolded and handcuffed during their trial, while their lawyer was not allowed to enter the court for the first three sessions.

“Peaceful protesters and supporters of political reform in the country have been targeted for arrest in an attempt to stamp out the kinds of call for reform that have echoed across the region,” said Amnesty’s Middle East and North Africa director, Philip Luther.

[Snip]

Amnesty says that the government continues to detain thousands of people on terrorism-related grounds. Torture and other ill-treatment in detention are widespread, it says – an allegation Saudi Arabia has always denied.

[snip]

Amnesty says the government has drafted an anti-terror law that would effectively criminalise dissent as a “terrorist crime” and allow extended detention without charge or trial.

Questioning the integrity of the king would carry a minimum prison sentence of 10 years, according to Amnesty.

[snip]

“Rather than deal with legitimate demands, the government is taking the easy route and blaming everything on a conspiracy by the Iranians,” said the activist, who asked not to be named for fear of repercussions.
The takeaway from the Amnesty report is that demonstrators have been active in Saudi Arabia just as long as in Libya and elsewhere, and as consistently—and, as elsewhere, have been dealt with harshly by their government. Somehow, though, this is not deemed a sufficiently important story to cover.

Could it have something to do with Saudi Arabia’s indispensability as an ally and supplier of oil? In which case, traditional news reporting standards do not apply?
And did anyone ask the US government, so quick to condemn Qaddafi for his crackdown on demonstrators, if it had any reaction to the Saudi crackdown on demonstrators? Doesn’t look like it.

Meanwhile, what of this scapegoating of Iran for what seems to be authentic Saudi dissent? How does this dovetail with the overall western effort to characterize Iran as behind every nefarious act, even the ludicrous-sounding plot announced months ago by the White House, in which the Iranians were purportedly trying to recruit Mexican drug gangs to kill the Saudi ambassador to the US?
What of the buildup to an attack on Iran, through the rightwing government of Israeli prime minister Netanyahu— decried even by the heads of Israel’s own intelligence agencies as unjustified and dangerous?

How much of this larger play is about keeping the Saudi royal family in power, and taking care of the Western oil industry, and the “western way of life”?
Consider Libya vs Saudi Arabia. Two oil producers, one unpredictable and unreliable, one tight with the West. Heavy coverage of dissent in one, almost none in the other.


SAUDIS AREN’T WAITING

Saudis know better than to wait for the establishment media to get into the act. One outlier that tends to be ahead of the pack, McClatchy Newspapers, just ran a piece on how Saudi dissidents are turning to YouTube to get their message out. Though Saudi Arabia’s high standard of living is a chestnut in media coverage, the dissidents highlight the disparities in the Kingdom in a homemade video:
One Saudi man he interviews has 11 children to feed and a net monthly income of $1,200, half of which goes to rent. The family has enough money left over only for flour and one meal a day. The imam at the local mosque reveals that in order to raise money for the household, the parents are sending out young sons to sell drugs, and the women engage in prostitution.

[snip]

While the film doesn’t explicitly explain the “Monopoly” of its title, a leading Saudi human rights activist said in an interview that it comes down to one thing: “All the land is owned de facto and de jure by the royal family.”
The article notes that uprising hasn’t begun yet—in part because of apathy.
But how much is apathy, and how much is Saudis realizing that no one will come to their aid if they risk throwing off their shackles? They cannot count on the handy boost the West gave to revolutions in nearby countries. Nor can they count on the Western media, which brays about its independence and initiative, but, increasingly, shows neither where the West’s precious oil supplies are involved.

http://angryarab.blogspot.com/2011/11/chants-death-to-house-of-saud-in-qatif.html



Russ Baker is an award-winning investigative reporter with a track record for making sense of complex and little understood matters-and explaining it to elites and ordinary people alike, using entertaining, accessible writing to inform and involve. he is Editor in Chief of www.WhoWhatWhy.com

Global Research Articles by Russ Baker

Tunisia: Uprising Drives Iron-Fisted Ruler From Power

The Tunisia uprising began one year ago today.  —  After 23 years of iron-fisted rule, the president of Tunisia was driven from power Friday by violent protests over soaring unemployment and corruption.


The riots started after an educated but jobless 26-year-old committed suicide in mid-December when police confiscated the fruits and vegetables he was selling without a permit. His desperate act hit a nerve, sparked copycat suicides and focused generalized anger against the regime into a widespread, outright revolt.



Tunisia Uprising


ELAINE GANLEY and BOUAZZA BEN BOUAZZA 01/14/11 11:53 PM ET AP

 
TUNIS, Tunisia — After 23 years of iron-fisted rule, the president of Tunisia was driven from power Friday by violent protests over soaring unemployment and corruption. Virtually unprecedented in modern Arab history, the populist uprising sent an ominous message to authoritarian governments that dominate the region.

The office of Saudi King Abdullah confirmed early Saturday that ousted President Zine El Abidine Ben Ali and his family had landed in Saudi Arabia, after several hours of mystery over his whereabouts. "As a result of the Saudi kingdom's respect for the exceptional circumstances the Tunisian people are going through, and with its wish for peace and security to return to the people of Tunisia, we have welcomed" him, the statement said.

Tunisians buoyant over Ben Ali's ouster faced uncertainly, however, about what's next for the North African nation. The country was under the caretaker leadership of the prime minister who took control, the role of the army in the transition was unknown, and it was uncertain whether Ben Ali's departure would be enough to restore calm.

The ouster followed the country's largest protests in generations and weeks of escalating unrest, sparked by one man's suicide and fueled by social media, cell phones and young people who have seen relatively little benefit from Tunisia's recent economic growth. Thousands of demonstrators from all walks of life rejected Ben Ali's promises of change and mobbed Tunis, the capital, to demand that he leave.

The government said at least 23 people have been killed in the riots, but opposition members put the death toll at more than three times that. On Friday, police repeatedly clashed with protesters, some of whom climbed onto the entrance roof of the dreaded Interior Ministry, widely believed for years to be a place where the regime's opponents were tortured.

With clouds of tear gas and black smoke drifting over the city's whitewashed buildings, Prime Minister Mohammed Ghannouchi went on state television to announce that he was assuming power in this North African nation known mostly for its wide sandy beaches and ancient ruins.
"I take over the responsibilities temporarily of the leadership of the country at this difficult time to help restore security," Ghannouchi said in a solemn statement on state television. "I promise ... to respect the constitution, to work on reforming economic and social issues with care and to consult with all sides." The prime minister, a longtime ally of the president, suggested that Ben Ali had willingly handed over control, but the exact circumstances were unclear.

In a string of last-ditch efforts to tamp down the unrest, Ben Ali dissolved the government and promised legislative elections within six months – a pledge that appeared to open at least the possibility of a new government. Before his removal of power was announced, he declared a state of emergency, including a curfew that was in effect Friday night and was to be lifted at 7 a.m. Saturday.
Isolated bursts of gunfire broke a general quiet in the evening. But overnight, in a sign that Ben Ali's departure hadn't fully restored calm, plainclothes police were seen hustling some people off the streets of Tunis: One was clubbed, another was dragged on the ground.

European tour companies moved thousands of tourists out of the country. Foreign airlines halted service to Tunisia, and said the country's airspace had been temporarily shut down.
Ben Ali's downfall sent a potentially frightening message to autocratic leaders across the Arab world, especially because he did not seem especially vulnerable until very recently.

He managed the economy of his small country of 10 million better than many other Middle Eastern nations grappling with calcified economies and booming young populations. He turned Tunisia into a beach haven for tourists, helping create an area of stability in volatile North Africa. There was a lack of civil rights and little or no freedom of speech, but a better quality of life for many than in neighboring countries such as Algeria and Libya.

Ben Ali had won frequent praise from abroad for presiding over reforms to make the economy more competitive and attract business. Growth last year was at 3.1 percent. Unemployment, however, was officially measured at 14 percent, and was far higher – 52 percent – among the young. Despair among job-seeking young graduates was palpable.

The riots started after an educated but jobless 26-year-old committed suicide in mid-December when police confiscated the fruits and vegetables he was selling without a permit. His desperate act hit a nerve, sparked copycat suicides and focused generalized anger against the regime into a widespread, outright revolt.

The president tried vainly to hold onto power. On Thursday night he went on television to promise not to run for re-election in 2014 and slashed prices on key foods such as sugar, bread and milk.
Protesters gathered peacefully Friday in front of the Interior Ministry, but six hours after the demonstration began hundreds of police with shields and riot gear moved in. Helmeted police fired dozens of rounds of tear gas and kicked and clubbed unarmed protesters – one of whom cowered on the ground, covering his face.

A few youths were spotted throwing stones, but most demonstrated calmly. Protesters were of all ages and from all walks of life, from students holding sit-ins in the middle of the street to doctors in white coats and black-robed lawyers waving posters. "A month ago, we didn't believe this uprising was possible," said Beya Mannai, a geology professor at the University of Tunis. "But the people rose up."
"My first reaction is relief," said Dr. Souha Naija, a resident radiologist at Charles Nicole Hospital. "He's gone. ... I finally feel free."

"They got the message. The people don't want a dictator." However, she voiced concern for the future because, officially at least, Ben Ali vacated power only temporarily. "It's ambiguous," she said.
Nejib Chebbi, a founder of the main legal opposition party, said the dramatic developments do not amount to a coup d'etat.

"It's an unannounced resignation," Chebbi said by telephone. To declare a permanent absence of a head of state, such as in a coup, elections would have to be held within 60 days, he said. "So they declare a temporary vacating of power."

U.S. President Barack Obama said he applauded the courage and dignity of protesting Tunisians, and urged all parties to keep calm and avoid violence. Arabs across the region celebrated news of the Tunisian uprising on Twitter, Facebook and blogs. Thousands of tweets congratulating the Tunisian people flooded the Internet, and many people changed their profile pictures to Tunisian flags.

Egyptian activists opposed to President Hosni Mubarak's three-decade regime looked to the events in Tunisia with hope. About 50 gathered outside the Tunisian Embassy in Cairo to celebrate with singing and dancing. They chanted, "Ben Ali, tell Mubarak a plane is waiting for him, too!"
Meanwhile, the New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists reported that three journalists detained in Tunisia had been released: bloggers Azyz Amamy and Slim Amamou, who were arrested on Jan. 7, and Radio Kalima correspondent Nizar Ben Hasan, who had been taken from his home Tuesday.

CPJ called for the release of journalist Fahem Boukadous, who it said is serving a four-year prison sentence for his coverage of 2008 labor protests. Earlier Friday, swirling speculation about Ben Ali's location had reached such a fevered pitch that the governments of France and Malta – just two of several countries where he was speculated to be heading – put out statements saying they have had no requests to accommodate him. One French official, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter, said the French government did not want Ben Ali there.
Ghannouchi is a 69-year-old economist who has been prime minister since 1999 and is among the best-known faces of Tunisia's government. He did not say anything about a coup or about the army being in charge.

Ben Ali, 74, came to power in a bloodless palace coup in 1987. He took over from a man formally called President-for-Life – Habib Bourguiba, the founder of modern-day Tunisia who set the Muslim country on a pro-Western course after independence from France in 1956.
Ben Ali removed Bourguiba from office for "incompetence," saying he had become too old, senile and sick to rule. Ben Ali promised then that his leadership would "open the horizons to a truly democratic and evolved political life." But after a brief period of reforms, Tunisia's political evolution stopped.

Ben Ali consistently won elections with questionable tallies: In 2009, he was re-elected for a fifth five-year term with 89 percent of the vote – and that was the lowest official percentage of any of his victories. Before that vote, he had warned opponents they would face legal retaliation if they questioned the election's fairness.

U.S. diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks have called Tunisia a "police state" and described the corruption there, saying Ben Ali had lost touch with his people. Social networks like Facebook helped spread the comments to the delight of ordinary Tunisians, who have complained about the same issues for years.

Under Ben Ali, most opposition parties were illegal. Amnesty International said authorities infiltrated human rights groups and harassed dissenters. Reporters Without Borders described Ben Ali as a "press predator" who controlled the media.

There is little precedent in the Arab world for a ruler being ousted by street protests. In Sudan in 1985, a collapsing economy and other grievances sparked a popular uprising, although the government was eventually ousted by a military coup.

The closest parallel in the broader Middle East comes from Iran – which is not an Arab nation – where mass demonstrations helped topple the shah and usher in the Islamic Republic in 1979.
Tunisia's giant neighbor Algeria saw huge protests before it was shaken by a military coup in 1992, with a five-man leadership put in place after the army canceled the nation's first multiparty legislative elections, which a Muslim fundamentalist party was poised to win. The party, the Islamic Salvation Front, became a vehicle for popular dissent.

There were also massive demonstrations in Lebanon in 2005, dubbed the "Cedar Revolution," but those were directed against Syrian influence in the country and not the Lebanese government per se. The protests led to the withdrawal of Syrian forces from Lebanon and the resignation of Lebanon's pro-Syrian prime minister and fresh elections. Al-Qaida's North African offshoot appeared to try to capitalize on the Tunisian unrest, offering its support for protesters this week. There has been no sign of Islamic extremist involvement in the rioting.

Nicolas Garriga and Oleg Cetinic in Tunis, Angela Doland, Greg Keller and Jamey Keaten in Paris and Hadeel Al-Shalchi in Cairo contributed to this report.

Middle East , , Tunisia Revolution , Tunisia Riots , Tunisia Uprising , World News

(pics) Politicians: Stupid Is What Stupid Does



"A vote for me is a vote for you. ....
...and if you believe that listen to Newt."



This is what Newt thinks of people:
"84 ethics violations? Who the fuck cares?
They are all a bunch of stupid idiots anyway."




"I am a better liar than the others. I am a shell game master!
I keep my money in the Seychelles.
O.K. you got me there, it's all really in the Camans."



 
 "It's my turn to be on top!"






"You Slut !! Birth control is for whores !! "
(but Vicoden is OK)
...so my wife is
   A: on the pill
         B: I am impotant
C: I am gay

 
 
 
Drill Baby Drill !!!
"I love it when you talk dirty."






Occupy Together

Goldman Sachs Exec Quits, Claiming Firm Is Morally Bankrupt

By David Schepp , Posted Mar 14th 2012 @ 9:46AM
 


Greg Smith (pictured), who serves as head of the firm's U.S. equity derivatives business in Europe, is leaving the firm today after 12 years with the Wall Street icon. As Smith writes, his departure is being driven by what he says is a shift in leadership style that no longer places clients' interests ahead of the firm's.


In his piece, Smith pulls no punches, holding current CEO Lloyd Blankfein and President Gary Cohn accountable for losing hold of the firm's once cherished culture that valued clients' interest above all else and helped make Goldman Sachs the world's premier investment bank.
"[T]he interests of the client continue to be sidelined in the way the firm operates and thinks about making money," Smith writes. "I truly believe that this decline in the firm's moral fiber represents the single most serious threat to its long-run survival."
The Goldman Sachs of today not only places little concern in the needs of its customers, says Smith, who is based in London, but internally mocks them.

Goldman Exec Quits And Writes Searing Op-Ed on Company
"I don't know of any illegal behavior, but will people push the envelope and pitch lucrative and complicated products to clients even if they are not the simplest investments or the ones most directly aligned with the client's goals? Absolutely. Every day, in fact."
Of course, not everyone believes Smith's rant was simply a polemic written by a well-intentioned albeit disgruntled employee.
As conservative opinion writer David Frum tweeted: "Nice of NYT to give Mr. Smith such a prominent ad for his new financial firm," apparently referring to a new venture Smith is embarking on.
Many other voices across Twitter weighed in. Robert Peston, business editor for the BBC, wrote: "This attack on Goldman Sachs from resigning exec is astonishing. The damage to the firm could be pretty serious."
Investment manager and media contributor Prashant Agrawal tweeted that Smith's column is "about to become the most famous #quit letter ever."
Others were more whimsical, such as this from Slate political reporter Dave Weigel, who tweeted: What I learned today: There's a job opening at Goldman Sachs. #dollardollarbills"
What's the potential fallout from Smith's rant? In The New York Times' own reporting on Smith's column, it observes, "The way he resigned from Goldman Sachs, and what he had to say, could reignite a debate over how much Wall Street has changed in the wake of the financial crisis."

Next: With Bonuses Slashed, Wall Street Is In Crisis


 

Indonesia : Higher Fuel Prices : Citizens and Government Dissagree

INDONESIA: REPUBLIKA.CO.ID, BOGOR--nearly four-hour meeting of the coalition party officials in Cikeas, but no definite decision on the agreement in carrying the increase in fuel prices. President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono.

Pertemuan Cikeas Belum Capai Putusan Soal BBM
Rabu, 14 Maret 2012 23:40 WIB
 
REPUBLIKA.CO.ID, BOGOR -- Hampir empat jam pertemuan para petinggi partai koalisi di Cikeas, tetapi tak ada keputusan pasti mengenai kesepakatan dalam mengusung kenaikan harga BBM. Presiden Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono menjelaskan pertemuan tersebut sifatnya memberikan penjelasan kepada partai koalisi dan menerima masukan dari partai-partai yang ada.

"Pertemuan tadi terjadi dengan konstruktif disamping saya dan pemerintah menjalaskan tentang perekonomian terkini dan kenapa dilakukan policy respon dan rencana-rencana tentang APBN-P. Saya juga berikan kesempatan kepada pimpinan parpol untuk menyampaikan pandangan dan rekonmendasinya," katanya Rabu malam sekitar pukul 22.30.

Pandangan dan usulan dari semua parpol koalisi dinilainya baik dan konstruktif. SBY juga menginginkan agar semua pihak menjalankan konstruksi dan menyelamatkan perekonomian Indonesia dari tekanan yang ada.

Namun, ia menegaskan forum yang dilakukan tidak menggantikan forum yang diamanatkan UU, yakni pembahasan di DPR. "Jadi sekali lagi, keputusan tidak pada forum konsultasi ini. Tapi pada UU yang berlaku," katanya.

Meskipun demikian, lanjutnya, pemerintahan yang dibangunnya adalah pemerintahan yang dibangun bersama parpol. "Jadi bagaimana pun ada misi bersama parpol untuk merumuskan kebijakan yang baik dan setelah diputuskan nanti dikawal dan diamankan agar berjalan dengan baik," katanya.

Dalam pertemuan tersebut, semua Ketua Umum serta Sekjen partai koalisi hadir disamping menteri-menteri terkait. Tampak dalam konferensi pers, Wapres Boediono, Menko Perekonomian Hatta Rajasa, Mensesneg Sudi Silalahi, Menteri ESDM Jero Wacik, Menteri Keuangan Agus Martowardojo. Ketum Partai Golkar Aburizal Bakrie, Ketum PPP Suryadharma Ali, Ketum PKB Muhaimin Iskandar, Presiden PKS Lutfi Hasan Ishaq, ketum PD Anas Urbaningrum, Sekjen PD Edhie Baskoro
Translation to English:

The Meeting Has Not Yet Achieved The Verdict About Cikeas BBM


Wednesday, March 14, 2012 11: 40 WIB



REPUBLIKA.CO.ID, BOGOR--nearly four-hour meeting of the coalition party officials in Cikeas, but no definite decision on the agreement in carrying the increase in fuel prices. President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono described the meeting is giving an explanation to the parties of the coalition and receive input from existing parties.


"The meeting was going on with me and my Government's constructive addition to menjalaskan about the current economy and why do policy response and plans about the BUDGET-P. I also give an opportunity to the leadership of the political party to convey views and rekonmendasinya, "he said Wednesday night at about 22.30.


The views and proposals of all the political parties of the Coalition dinilainya good and constructive. YUDHOYONO also wanted to keep all parties run construction and save the economy of Indonesia from the pressure.


However, he stressed that the forum does not replace the forum mandated Act, namely the discussion in the House. "So again, no decision on this consultation forum. But on the LAW in force, "he said.


Nevertheless, he continued, the Government is to build a Government that was built along the Centre. "So how ever there is a joint mission of the Centre to formulate good policies and after it was decided later escorted and secured to run well," he said.


In the meeting, the Chairman and the General Secretary of the all party coalition present besides the Ministers concerned. It looks in the press conference, Vice President Boediono, Coordinating Minister for the economy Hatta Rajasa, Secretary of State, Minister of MINERAL RESOURCES Silalahi Jero Wacik, Minister of finance Agus Martowardojo. Ketum Golkar, Aburizal Bakrie Suryadharma Ali Ketum PPP, PKB Muhaimin Iskandar Ketum, President of MCC Lutfi Hassan Ishaq, Anas Urbaningrum ketum PD PD Edhie Baskoro, Secretary General

(pics) Forced Fossil Fuel Consumption = War For Profit = Money in Politics




 










 


 
 









 


Bush 9/11 Inaction from NewsFocus on Vimeo.




 
 
 


http://www.911truth.org/




 
 LIBYA






RICK SANTORUM



 
 






 

NATURAL GAS BURN OFF




 
 EGYPT








OIL SPILL


 NIGERIA











BP, HALIBURTON
DEEPWATER HORIZON DISASTER


 
 

 PALESTINE





TOXIC COAL SLURRY SPILL





SAN BRUNO NATURAL GAS EXPLOSION
DESTROYED NEIGHBORHOOD
KILLED 8










 
 SYRIA





 COAL FIRED ELECTRICITY PLANT




 
 SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE

 
 
 
 
 
 












 
 



 
 





 CHEVRON OIL TANKER
CONDALEEZA RICE



 


 
GEORGE BUSH ABOARD AIRCRAFT CARRIER
STEAMING TO IRAQ






 
CONDALEEZA RICE ABOARD AIRCRAFT CARRIER
STEAMING TO IRAQ
 
 
Our Military, Our politicians, and "our" oil. Looks Pretty Mickey Mouse to the rest of the world.

 

Stratfor CEO:


Occupy Boston  Disrupts Stratfor CEO Friedman. Stratfor studies foreign policy and publishes their findings. Friedman claims that they discarded the emails concerning OWS and did not use them. He went on to claim that Stratfor is not interested in what OWS is doing, further he said that had Occupy Boston been located in Pakistan that they would be very interested in Occupy Policy.

Here is where his lie ignorance is exposed. Foreign Policy is Global Policy. There is no social difference between foriegn policy and domestic policy when citizens are in the streets protesting these policies. Stratfor therefore should be interested in occupy and therefore have a duty to include it in it's global studies.


(pic) Middle East Through Western Eyes, Not Mainstream Media








Syria

Israeli occupation of the Golan Heights
The Golan Heights is a strategic plateau and mountainous region in southwestern Syria. Two-thirds of the area is currently occupied by Israel. It comprises 1,850 square kilometres (714 sq mi) and includes mountains reaching an altitude of 2,880 metres (9,449 ft) above sea level.
The heights dominate the plains below. The Jordan River, Lake Tiberias and the Hula Valley border the region on the west. To the east is the Raqqad Valley and the south is Yarmok River and valley. The northern boundary of the region is the mountain Jabal al-Sheikh (Mount Hermon), one of the highest in Southwest Asia.
An agreement to establish a demilitarized zone between Israel and Syria was signed on 20 July 1949,[126] but border clashes continued. Israel captured the Golan Heights from Syria in the 1967 Six-Day War. Between 80,000 and 109,000 of the inhabitants fled, mostly Druze and Circassians.[127][128]
In 1973, Syria tried to regain control of the Golan Heights in a surprise attack on Yom Kippur, the holiest day of the Jewish year.[citation needed] Despite initial Syrian advances and heavy Israeli losses, the Golan Heights remained in Israeli hands after a successful Israeli counter attack.
Syria and Israel signed an armistice agreement in 1974, and a United Nations observer force was stationed there. Israel unilaterally annexed the Golan Heights in 1981, although the Syrian government continues to demand the return of this territory, possibly in the context of a peace treaty. In 1982, Druze in the Golan Heights started a strike against the annexation of the territory. The strike lasted for six months and as a result the Israeli army sealed off Druze villages, allowing only those who wished to work in Israel to leave.[129] Israel has given the Druze citizens in the Golan Heights an Israeli citizenship after the annexation of the Golan Heights.[130]
After the Six-Day War, a population of 20,000 Syrians remained in the Golan Heights, most of them Druze. Since 2005, Israel has allowed Druze apple farmers in the Golan to sell their produce to Syria. In 2006, the export total reached 8,000 tons of apples.[131] Syrian residents of the Golan are also permitted to study at universities in Syria, where they are entitled to free tuition, books and lodging.[132]
 








Israel's Bitch



John McCain, Obama's Bitch




 Hi ! My name is John McCain, Sarah Palin is my bitch (but I'm the bottom.)
I've been on TV to convince you to look the other way and keep your mouth shut when
we call in air strikes on Syria, and to confuse the fuck out of you about Al Qada.

Al Qada is a CIA militia but we want you to belive that they are our enemy. Thats why we blamed them for 9/11 but obviously since Al Qada are really CIA militia, we conspired to destroy the Twin Towers and part of the Pentagon to destroy evidence of our illicite activities and provide an excuse to the public to send an invasion force to the middle east so that we can sieze more oil
and take away your constitutional rights at the same time.

Israel is our non-Muslim foothold where all of the oil is, and we hate Muslims because they have seen the evil a corrupt capitolist system is capable of for more than 60 years. The people of Syria have suffered some of the worst human rights abuses at the hand of their own government for years and they have revolted against their government and calling for human rights. Al Qada has come to their aid and are fighting government troops in the street side by side with the Syrian people.
Now I want to call in air strikes against the Syrian government on the same side as Al Qada
(who we have already told you are our enemy.) 

Are you sufficiently confused or do you finally understand what Muslims have known for far too long now? I want you to look into my cold dead eyes when I appear on TV and be so sufficiently confused that you decide that it is easier to ignore it all and go shopping at Wal-Mart, watch American Idol, bounce a rubber ball around or pay to watch someone else do it, take all the drugs advertised on TV, and buy a new car instead.

I want you to forget or never learn of all the covert wars that the CIA has been involved in: Vietnam, Korea, Cuba, San Salvador, Angola, Nicaragua, Greneda, and in Guatamala suppressing the Sandanista's with the CIA backed Contras because the Sandanistas were fighting for Healthcare, education, and gender equality. All of these places were either socialist, communist, muslim,
or anything but white christian capitolists .... (sound familiar?)  

I hope not, I need you to keep believing us because we are in a big hurry to make even more money so just throw up your arms in exasperation and submission so we can get on with our work,and when printing more money to finance more war causes inflation which makes you poorer, and when you give up more rights and freedoms in order to make our oligarchy more secure,
don't worry, we will just blame it on Al Qada.

Sincerely,
Your BFF (until I retire) John.















 Glenn (the N ) Beck




 Rush (Limpy) Limbaugh





 Bill (Brown Nose) O'Reilly


Guess what guys ! The american people don't believe your shit any more.
 Now when you come on TV and tell us why you do what you do,
we all know that you are lying.

Every word out of your mouths incriminates yourselves even deeper.

You have become vain adj. 1. having no real value; worthless 2. without effect; futile
3. having an excessively high regard for one's self, looks, etc; conceited -in vain
1. fruitlessly 2. profanely -vainly adv.
Your time is done. You dig your own grave with every word.

As I write this I am listening to president Obama's live TV speech March 6, 2012 about Israel, Syria, oil prices, so called U.S. security interests in other countries, green energy, and womens reproductive rights in regards to Rush Limbaughs demeaning comments about women. 

True to his oligarchical self, he turned the womens issue into an economic issue,
and claimed that we must isolate other countries economically and politically.
His lies are transparent and his forked tail is showing.